If your idea is weak from a creative point of view, AI will only make the situation with the content even worse. And if the idea is interesting and potentially viral, viewers will often close their eyes to the fact that the visuals were generated. In this way, projects like
Gossip Goblin and
Spikeandred are good examples. Their visuals are AI-generated, but people engage wtih them because the ideas are interesting, unexpected and worth sharing. Behind these projects are still creative teams, directors and designers who shape the concepts, develop the visual language and curate the AI-generated output.
AI is just a tool. The thing that makes a project cool is still the idea and efforts behind it. This confirms the fact that good content needs to bring some kind of value to the viewer — an unusual visual narrative, perspective on things, interesting facts, emotions.
When a company simply shows its product through an AI-generated visual, without any attempt to provide some kind of value to the viewer, it's almost guaranteed that this video will get very little reach and receive even a dismissive reaction. If the company doesn't care about its content, then why should consumers care about this company? Subconsciously, the audience begins to perceive the brand and its products as 'cheap'. If a company decides to cut corners on its visual communication, consumers will naturally assume they are also cutting corners on their product quality. Ultimately, this "cost-saving" approach leads to a severe loss of brand trust and image.
Working with designers, 3D artists, animators or combining traditional production with AI could give the final result a stronger intention and value. The audience is more likely to perceive it as something that was deliberately created for the brand rather than something that could have been generated by anyone in a few minutes.